Zilch acquisition funnel optimisation

Zilch is a UK-based buy now, pay later platform serving more than five million customers, enabling them to spread the cost of purchases across interest-free instalments.

I was the lead designer in the Growth and Acquisition team, working closely with a product manager, engineers and a data analyst. I also collaborated with the Decisioning, Marketing and KYC teams on areas of the onboarding journey that crossed team boundaries.

Our objective was to increase the number of customers reaching their first spend by identifying and fixing the biggest points of friction in the acquisition funnel. Alongside the funnel improvements, I helped bring the new Zilch brand into the product while raising the overall quality and consistency of the whole app experience.

Scope

End-to-end acquisition funnel, first spend and retention

Acquisition, onboarding and first spend

Collaboration

Growth, Marketing, Decisioning, CRM and Delivery teams

Contribution

Ownership

Product strategy, experimentation and end-to-end design

Product strategy, experimentation, UX research and design

Platform

Native App and Web

24%

24%

Overall funnel conversion increase

Peak overall conversion rate

1-2k

1-2k

Additional first-time spenders each month

Additional first-time spenders each month

-11.4%

-11.4%

Median TTC in a 30 day period

Median TTC in a 30 day period

-72.5%

-72.5%

Fewer login attempts

Fewer login attempts

THE OPPORTUNITY

A funnel optimised for new users, not real customer behaviour.

A funnel optimised for new users, not real customer behaviour.

The funnel treated people who'd applied before, changed their details or returned later as brand new customers. As a result, many motivated customers failed long before reaching their first spend.

THE USER

35% of applications failed during phone verification. Customers averaged 4+ login attempts each month, while 40% of applicants who signed the credit agreement never completed identity verification.

PRODUCT

No concept of a returning customer. Existing email? Generic error. Phone number linked to another account? OTP silently failed to send. No routing, no recovery and no explanation.

BUSINESS

Customers who had already decided to use Zilch were failing to reach their first spend. Every 1% conversion improvement could deliver approximately ยฃ1.2M in lifetime value, making this one of the biggest commercial opportunities in the funnel.

THE USER

No frame of reference for the product. US pet owners were not used with the concept of pet insurance but rather pet wellness products. The flow had to educate and convert at the same time, without adding friction.

PRODUCT

The UK product couldn't simply be copied. User behaviour, terminology, and expectations were genuinely different. Everything had to be researched and designed from scratch.

BUSINESS

ManyPets was going through a transformation, changing it's name from BoughtByMany in order to appeal more to the US customer. This meant that the new branding was developed along side the new flows which made the process more complicated.

REPRIORITISING THE ROADMAP

Shifting the roadmap towards higher-impact opportunities

Shifting the roadmap towards higher-impact opportunities

By challenging the existing roadmap through customer data, behavioural analysis and competitor research, I helped steer the team towards higher-impact opportunities.

Rather than immediately redesigning the experience, I reviewed customer behaviour, security-related friction and the competitive landscape to understand where we could create the greatest value. The evidence suggested our biggest opportunity wasn't acquiring more traffic, but helping motivated customers successfully complete the journey.

Working closely with Product, Engineering and Growth, I used these insights to influence the roadmap. We shifted our focus from feature parity and acquisition towards reducing friction, while identifying an opportunity to move customers into the app earlier. This reduced duplicated engineering effort, strengthened security and created a stronger long-term product strategy.

RESEARCH

Building a complete picture before proposing solutions

Building a complete picture before proposing solutions

Before proposing solutions, I wanted to understand where customers were dropping off and why. I analysed the end-to-end journey using behavioural data, customer feedback, competitor research and a UX audit to prioritise the highest-impact opportunities.

I started at the top of the funnel, where credential stuffing and fraud attempts had the biggest impact, before working through each stage of the journey to first spend.

Customer feedback

Used customer feedback to validate recurring onboarding failures. OTP and login issues consistently prevented customers from re-entering the journey.

Behavioural analysis

Partnered with the Data team to investigate the highest-impact points in the funnel. We improved Mixpanel instrumentation where needed before using the data to prioritise solutions.

Market analysis

Validated an app-first strategy was the right long-term direction. Most mature BNPL products had already moved away from web onboarding.

Experience audit

Audited the end-to-end experience to identify navigation, copy and interaction inconsistencies across web and app.

THE USER

No frame of reference for the product. US pet owners were not used with the concept of pet insurance but rather pet wellness products. The flow had to educate and convert at the same time, without adding friction.

PRODUCT

The UK product couldn't simply be copied. User behaviour, terminology, and expectations were genuinely different. Everything had to be researched and designed from scratch.

BUSINESS

ManyPets was going through a transformation, changing it's name from BoughtByMany in order to appeal more to the US customer. This meant that the new branding was developed along side the new flows which made the process more complicated.

MAIN FINDINGS

Three core failures spread across the funnel

Three core failures spread across the funnel

The research revealed three recurring failures responsible for most onboarding drop-offs. These became the focus of the work that followed.

ACCOUNT RECOVERY

Customers couldn't recover abandoned applications

Users averaged 4 login attempts before becoming first-time spenders, with 76% caused by authentication loops. Once customers abandoned an application, there was no way to recover their progress.

ACCOUNT RECOVERY

Customers couldn't recover abandoned applications

Users averaged 4 login attempts before becoming first-time spenders, with 76% caused by authentication loops. Once customers abandoned an application, there was no way to recover their progress.

PHONE VERIFICATION

35% of users fail at phone verification step

Phone numbers remained linked to unverified accounts, preventing customers from restarting the journey.

PHONE VERIFICATION

35% of users fail at phone verification step

Phone numbers remained linked to unverified accounts, preventing customers from restarting the journey.

ID VERIFICATION

40% of users don't complete IDV

This was the third main drop off area, where we were letting users explore the app before they were verified with no education added prior to them seeing the app for the first time.

ID VERIFICATION

40% of users don't complete IDV

This was the third main drop off area, where we were letting users explore the app before they were verified with no education added prior to them seeing the app for the first time.

BEYOND THE BRIEF

Finding opportunities beyond my team's focus

Opportunities I uncovered outside my teamโ€™s area of focus

While working on the acquisition funnel, I regularly identified opportunities beyond my team's roadmap. Rather than documenting them, I partnered with other teams to build the case, align stakeholders and help turn them into initiatives.

VISION ยท FUTURE ONBOARDING

Introduced a notification centre to improve engagement

Scoped, aligned stakeholders and delivered a new notification centre to improve customer engagement and campaign effectiveness.

OPERATIONS ยท COMMS AUDIT

Created the first complete audit of customer communications

Mapped every customer message across teams, removing duplication and giving Marketing and our team a shared reference for future initiatives.

IDV PROVIDER ยท ONFIDO

Escalated a recurring IDV failure pattern to Onfido

Identified that poor lighting sent 24% of applicants to manual review and partnered with Onfido to explore improvements.

EXPERIMENTATION

Using experiments to deliver value while bigger changes were underway

Using experiments to deliver value while bigger changes were underway

While larger funnel improvements required significant engineering effort, I used targeted experiments to validate assumptions, reduce delivery risk and generate immediate business value.


Before
After

MID-FUNNEL ยท A/B TEST

Simplifying the way credit limits were displayed

HYPOTHESIS

Showing both the starting and potential credit limit would encourage more customers to complete sign-up by making the offer feel like future growth rather than a fixed decision.

SOLUTION

Reframed how credit limits were presented by introducing the concept of growth: "Start with ยฃX, grow to ยฃY." while removing the confusing dial immagery.

Results

+3,8% conversion increase. ยฃ1.054M net profit attributed. Rolled out to all customers

Key learning

Customers responded better when the credit limit was framed as growth rather than a fixed decision.

POST-SIGNUP ยท A/B TEST

Testing whether early education changes first spend behaviour.

HYPOTHESIS

Helping customers understand how Zilch works immediately after sign-up would increase the likelihood of a first spend.

SOLUTION

Introduced a short onboarding flow highlighting Zilch's core value proposition immediately after sign-up. The messaging was refined through user interviews before launch.

Results

+2% increase in customers reaching first spend

Key learning

Education benefited higher-value customers, while lower-tier users prioritised speed over guidance.

Before
After

MID-FUNNEL ยท A/B TEST

Simplifying the way credit limits were displayed

HYPOTHESIS

Showing both the starting and potential credit limit would encourage more customers to complete sign-up by making the offer feel like future growth rather than a fixed decision.

SOLUTION

Reframed how credit limits were presented by introducing the concept of growth: "Start with ยฃX, grow to ยฃY." while removing the confusing dial immagery.

Results

+3,8% conversion increase. ยฃ1.054M net profit attributed. Rolled out to all customers

Key learning

Customers responded better when the credit limit was framed as growth rather than a fixed decision.

POST-SIGNUP ยท A/B TEST

Testing whether early education changes first spend behaviour.

HYPOTHESIS

Helping customers understand how Zilch works immediately after sign-up would increase the likelihood of a first spend.

SOLUTION

Introduced a short onboarding flow highlighting Zilch's core value proposition immediately after sign-up. The messaging was refined through user interviews before launch.

Results

+2% increase in customers reaching first spend

Key learning

Education benefited higher-value customers, while lower-tier users prioritised speed over guidance.

AREA 1 OF 3 ยท ACCOUNT CREATION

Recognising existing customers from the start

Recognising existing customers from the start

30% of phone numbers were already linked to another account, causing OTP verification to silently fail. By collecting email first, we could recognise existing customers immediately, route them correctly and avoid unnecessary authentication failures.

I also partnered closely with backend engineers to ensure the solution remained secure.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Three principles before a single screen was designed:

  1. Every customer should have a clear path forward, regardless of the information they provide.

  2. We never confirm or deny whether an account exists, security first.

  3. Trusted devices should experience less friction, while new devices complete verification only once.

We planned delivery in three phases:

the initial routing logic, an interim OTP fallback state, and a future state removing the 30-day session expiry.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Three principles before a single screen was designed:

  1. Every customer should have a clear path forward, regardless of the information they provide.

  2. We never confirm or deny whether an account exists, security first.

  3. Trusted devices should experience less friction, while new devices complete verification only once.

We planned delivery in three phases:

the initial routing logic, an interim OTP fallback state, and a future state removing the 30-day session expiry.

Reliable account recovery

If a phone number was linked to another account, users were told clearly and given a path to their existing account.

Early account recognition

Existing accounts detected at step one rather than being checked in the middle of the flow. Returning users routed to login and verified before hitting any dead ends.

Device-aware experience

Trusted devices get a streamlined login. New devices get full verification once, then trusted from that point forward.

AREA 2 OF 3 ยท PLATFORM STRATEGY

Treating web as an entry point, not the product

Treating web as an entry point, not the product

The original roadmap focused on achieving full web/app parity. After analysing the market and our own product, I challenged that direction and proposed treating web as an entry point instead. By moving customers into the app earlier via a QR code, we could reduce engineering effort, improve security and eliminate long-term parity debt.

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

I helped change the strategy before changing the interface.

  1. Competitor analysis showed mature BNPL products had already moved away from web onboarding.

  2. Engineering discussions highlighted that web increased credential-stuffing risk and complicated event tracking.

  3. Rebuilding web would have taken months while still delivering a second-class experience.

A QR code handoff

Redirected customers to the stronger native experience, removed long-term parity debt and significantly reduced engineering effort.

STRATEGIC DIRECTION

I helped change the strategy before changing the interface.

  1. Competitor analysis showed mature BNPL products had already moved away from web onboarding.

  2. Engineering discussions highlighted that web increased credential-stuffing risk and complicated event tracking.

  3. Rebuilding web would have taken months while still delivering a second-class experience.

A QR code handoff

Redirected customers to the stronger native experience, removed long-term parity debt and significantly reduced engineering effort.

Web as entry point, not product

Users get a compelling prompt to continue on app via QR code rather than a degraded web experience.

Cleaner security posture

Removing web sign-ups eliminated the credential stuffing attack surface that had been a persistent vulnerability.

Parity debt gone

One codebase, one journey. Every future improvement applied everywhere rather than being built twice.

AREA 3 OF 3 ยท FIXING TASK COMPLETION RATE

Removing uncertainty from identity verification

Changing the IDV behaviour so users donโ€™t have to guess if they can use the app or not

40% of customers who signed the credit agreement never completed identity verification. While their application was being reviewed, they landed in a storefront they couldn't use with little explanation. I redesigned the pending experience, moved key notifications earlier in the journey and repositioned the credit agreement after ID verification to create a clearer path to completion.

PRODUCT LOGIC

The first solution uncovered a second problem

  1. The initial solution focused on clarity. Users understood their pending status, next steps and when they would hear back.

  2. We then uncovered a second journey. Customers returning days later were re-entering an experience that no longer reflected their application state.

  3. That led to a dedicated re-engagement flow. Returning users received contextual messaging, while Marketing and product communications were aligned around the same journey.

This required changes beyond the interface.

Applications past the expiry window needed to reset cleanly, so every edge case was mapped with Product and Engineering before implementation.

PRODUCT LOGIC

The first solution uncovered a second problem

  1. The initial solution focused on clarity. Users understood their pending status, next steps and when they would hear back.

  2. We then uncovered a second journey. Customers returning days later were re-entering an experience that no longer reflected their application state.

  3. That led to a dedicated re-engagement flow. Returning users received contextual messaging, while Marketing and product communications were aligned around the same journey.

This required changes beyond the interface.

Applications past the expiry window needed to reset cleanly, so every edge case was mapped with Product and Engineering before implementation.

"Your credit limit is waiting"

Users who returned after dropping off IDV were met with a targeted screen. Those past the expiry window had their application reset cleanly.

Clear pending state

Users knew exactly where they were and what to expect, instead of landing in a shopfront they couldn't use.

Only commit after verification

M1 status only set after full completion. No more phantom M1s from users who signed the agreement but never finished IDV.

OUTCOMES

More users through the funnel, same acquisition spend.

More users through the funnel, same acquisition spend.

Every conversion gain came from removing friction, not increasing acquisition spend.

+24%

Overall funnel conversion

13.2% โ†’ 16.4% (+24% relative increase)

+24%

Overall funnel conversion

13.2% โ†’ 16.4% (+24% relative increase)

-72.5%

Average login attempts

Reduced from 4 attempts to 1 per customer in a 30 day period

-72.5%

Average login attempts

Reduced from 4 attempts to 1 per customer in a 30 day period

Built a dedicated UX dashboard

Built a Mixpanel dashboard tracking error rates, desktop-to-app transitions and time-to-complete, giving the team visibility into UX metrics that weren't previously measured in other dashboards.

Bonus: Built a Custom MixPanel dashboard

I built this dashboard from scratch to track UX metrics specifically such as OTP success rates, email verification completion, error rates, and median TTC

WHAT I LEARNED

I went from validating ideas to deciding which ideas were worth pursuing.

I went from validating ideas to deciding which ideas were worth pursuing.

This project changed how I use data. It became less about validating ideas and more about using evidence to decide what was worth building in the first place.

After running multiple experiments, I became the person deciding what to instrument, what to deprioritise and what not to build until the data justified it.

The future onboarding proposal, the communications audit and the work with Onfido weren't in my brief. They came from staying close to the problem, spotting gaps and having the confidence to push them forward.

That's what I now see as the strategic part of product design: identifying the opportunities worth solving before anyone asks you to.

Doing the market research before touching Figma was the best call on this project. Because we understood US users and their context before we built for them, we had very few structural fixes post-launch. We spent that time on improvements instead of corrections.

The personalisation round taught me something I hadn't expected. Adding the city skyline, breed icons, and condition-specific copy moved conversion from 5% to 12%. Not because the flow worked better functionally โ€” it already did. Because users felt like the product was built for them specifically. In a category where trust is hard to earn, that matters more than most things.